Vol. 5

 

Letter to the editor of downstreet.net

 

       City’s Disadvantaged Overlooked in Recent Override Vote

 

            Dear Mr. Shanahan:

            Your support of the recent over-ride of the Proposition 2 1/2 law seems as if it may not have been adequately well-considered.
 As an upstanding citizen of Northampton for lo these many years, you are certainly acquainted with the many elderly, "getting-there", or economically disadvantaged residents of Northampton who are going to be the ultimate losers upon the implementation of this over-ride.

           When these residents lose or are forced to move from their homes given this spartan economic climate, where will you stand?  There is some credible reason to believe that the mayor has "cried wolf" in the past and ended up making ill-advised hires - particularly within the Fire Department - that were unnecessary to begin with and have skewed the current equation to the point of suspicious imbalance.
  Did Northampton TRULY need this over-ride to keep basic services functioning?  

           My career has taken me far from Northampton, but I remember the Gazette under your tenure was an instrument of journalistic integrity.
 I have no problem with your support for the over-ride measure on the face of it, but I am concerned that it does not seem as if you have even "asked the questions" ie: who are the impacted parties and to what extent?

           It is reasonable to ask on the local level why this was not a subject of discourse unless the truth was that it was simply recognized by all parties that there were going to be economic casualties and this was part of the initial design.  How else can it be explained that there has been no discussion--at least of which I am aware--of what can or might be done by the community at large that will benefit from the over-ride to lend a hand to those who are at imminent risk of being put out of their homes and going from respected citizens, albeit on fixed incomes, to "wards of the state" living in institutions solely as a result of this measure.

          I have to believe that we are better than this.

         Yours sincerely,

         Bryan Hickey

         4241 Westside Drive
         Acworth, GA   30114

                                  

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

                                                                                              

 

Samuel Lapham Hill’s Legacy

The Hill Institute: "A Private School Serving the Public"

                                                                                                           

                                                                                                           By Ann Shanahan

       We moved to Northampton in 1971 and for many of the intervening years have lived in Florence.  During all that time, we have been aware of the now 133-year-old Hill Institute but our children did not attend their kindergarten, none of us ever took any of their craft courses (until my husband enrolled the most recent term of “drawing basics” taught by Lindsay Fogg-Willits). Moreover, we had never been to even one of the annual exhibitions that feature the work done in those courses…until very recently.

       On the first weekend in June, the Hill Institute held its annual display of art and crafts that students, both adults and young people, have produced this year: Cape Cod baskets, family trees artfully displayed in calligraphy, gorgeous cedar strip canoes, all manner of crocheting, oil paintings, slip-covers for upholstered chairs, hooked rugs and furniture made in classes ranging from beginning to “master furniture,” and every craft you can think of in between.

 

Virtually every room in the big mansion at 86 Pine St. was teeming with visitors during the exhibition’s open hours. Many of the crafters were present to answer questions about their work.  On Saturday morning there demonstrations, including some youngsters weaving at looms on the lawn.

Desk by Ted Addis, (several years in the making)

    

    

Hill Institute offers dozens of classes in fall and spring sessions each year.  In the fall of 2009, there will be 60 classes, meeting mostly weekday evenings and running anywhere from 7 to 14 weeks for two or three hours at a time.  (The 14-week class is the canoe-making one—probably because it takes a good deal longer to make a canoe than a basket!) Fees vary from $120 for canoe-building and $80 for furniture-making to $40 for most adult classes and $35 for most youth classes. To see the full array of courses, visit the Hill Institute Web site.

       When Samuel Lapham Hill first came to Florence in 1841, he was already a successful entrepreneur. He organized the Nonotuck Silk Company here, established the Hill Institute and founded the free Florence Kindergarten, which opened its doors in 1876 in the “front room” of Hill’s home at 33 Maple St and continues today.

       The Hill Industrial School was established in 1900.  According to “Hill Institute,” a booklet published in 2001 on the 125th anniversary of  the institute’s founding, early courses were offered in general sewing, dressmaking, millinery and shirtwaist. “Instruction was provided for making such period fashions as ‘plain corset covers’ and ‘elaborate unlined dresses.’ The Domestic Science Department offered instruction in general cookery, invalid cookery and chafing dish, which included such specialties as fricasseed oysters, English monkey, lobster a la poulette and minced veal on toast.”

       The only cuisine course offered in the fall schedule is “vegetarian cooking,” which speaks to the change in tastes over time!

         Diane Welter,  rug hooking

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

Follow the Money

At the Bank, City Hall and Beyond

 

                                                            By Edward Shanahan 

                 Here-we-go-again department:

                 Did you get your letter from the Florence Savings Bank the other day offering you a “discretionary  OOPS limit of $800” to cover any overdrafts in your checking account?

                A customer service staffer told me when I called to inquire about this new financial wrinkle  - Occasional Overdraft Privilege Service  (OOPS) – that it is a “a mini loan for overdrafts.” This means don’t worry about bouncing a check, because the bank will cover it up to an extra $800.  In fact, it almost seems the bank would like you to write checks even though you don’t have sufficient funds in your account.

 Especially since the bank will charge you a $28 fee for each overdraft, even if its only a $1, and you can bounce as many checks as you up want up to the $800 the limit, at an additional $28 a pop, which goes to the bank. When you make a deposit you first have to repay the deficit amount in the OOPS loan advance.

 Increasingly,  banks are finding new and creative ways to generate revenue and profits through fees, which are often subtle, like  the $1 charge to merely check your balance at an out-of-town ATM.

               And, of course, FSB continues to promote its Rewards checking   account with newspaper ads and on-line promotions that celebrate the huge sums in interest and other benefits depositors enjoy.

               For example, despite declining interest rates paid by the bank – now 2.17 percent on Rewards account, an on-line promotion features one customer boasting about the $216.35 he earned in interest on his account last month.

               By my rudimentary calculations, if we use an interest rate of 2.20 percent, that specific customer would have to carry a monthly balance of about of about $120,000.

               Come on. This is a patently deceptive promotion.  Who among us has a checking account with a monthly average balance of  $120,000? Ain’t likely many, if any, with the possible exception of  the top FSB executive.

                                                              __________________________________________

               In baseball, a batting average of .250 is mediocre at best, but I had hoped for a better response  when I recently sent off a two page e-mail to the four members of the City Council’s Public Safety committee, with a copy to Mayor Higgins.

               I was seeking information and feedback from councilors about the proposed  expansion of  Northampton Fire Department  personnel to operate a full-time ambulance service at  a time when other municipal departments are facing reductions in both spending and manpower.

               As a reporter and a citizen, I felt I might be entitled to at least an acknowledgment of my query and comments, even if I did not get the information I was seeking.

              Ward 4 Councilor David Narkewicz  emailed to say he had received my message and, at the City Council budget hearing, actually framed a question for department officials that touched on my concerns.

              A follow-up extensive phone call conversation with Narkewicz clarified many aspects of the expanded ambulance plan, though I’m still not convinced the optimistic financing of it is entirely sound. We agreed only time will tell.

              Meanwhile, I was greeted by total silence from Councilors Maureen Carney, Bob Reckman and David Murphy.

              So I was 1 for 4, even 1 for 5 if we count the mayor, not good, although I’m not sure whether that was my fault or the councilors’.

                                                                  ________________________________________                                     

              Communities across the Commonwealth have been struggling with the consequences of the property tax limiting Proposition 2/1/2, which was based on a similar tax referendum first hatched in California.

              For much of the last 25 years communities have been able to count on additional state aid to compensate for the revenue ceilings imposed at the local level.

             That worked out pretty well, although never well enough to fully  meet the expanding cost of local municipal services.

            When the Recession finally hit full tilt, as it has in the last couple of years, a deficit-burdened state simply was unable to pick up the slack for local communities. It can’t even balance its own budget. Citizen  referenda often are won or lost on emotion, bad information, uncontrolled anger and mean spiritedness, the long-term consequences be damned.

            So there is no choice here in our hometown but to vote Yes on June 16 for the general override to raise at least $2 million , a chunk of the money needed to maintain schools, police, public works and other city services required by a community like Northampton. The state can’t help us out, and this is the only way to try to help ourselves, until the economic clouds move on. When that might be, none of us can say.

                                                                         

                                           _________________________________________________________

            Even a long-retired editor shudders with the daily woeful headlines and stories about the decline and fall of newspapers. For me, the surprise report from Clifford Teutsch, a former Gazette reporter, that he had quit his job as editor of the Hartford Courant, was the most painful to date.

            Clifford had been at the Courant, one of the oldest and previously most admired papers in the country, for nearly 30 years, working his way from reporter, to managing editor, and finally reaching the pinnacle as editor.

           The explanation for his departure was that he and the new corporate manager from the debt-ridden, bankrupt, Tribune Co. in Chicago were not “a good fit.” In other words, their values and principles were in conflict about the role of the daily newspaper.

  

           Clifford was one of the best reporters and most principled journalists  and human beings I have ever had the privilege of knowing and working with.  That he should find continuing to edit the Courant untenable is to lament the future prospects of the Courant and its bosses. Clifford, a solid citizen to the core, will be fine, I guarantee.

           Meanwhile, I was surprised to learn the other day that Mary Carey, a very good reporter for the Gazette, had been laid off,  another victim of the poor economy and its impact on the newspaper industry. I recall for many years her very thorough and intelligent reporting from the State House on legislative process and politics and their affect on local communities.

           Shifting from the State House beat, she then worked in the paper’s Amherst bureau. She also wrote literate movie reviews for the paper.

         

              

      ________________________________________________________________________________________________

Editor's note

        Go to downstreet.net archives  to read all of our previous commentary.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

                                                                                                                  
            

           

          

     

 


downstreet.netdownstreet.net©2001. All rights reserved.Site Designed by Found Design